Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 09:10

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Dejected Joshua Kimmich reacts to Germany’s Nations League defeat - Bavarian Football Works
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Farewell, Mr. Eclipse: Fred Espenak dies at 71 - Astronomy Magazine
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why am I not getting any atheists to debate with? Are they scared?
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Cher’s son Elijah Blue Allman hospitalized after drug overdose: report - Page Six
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ask Ethan: What would the Universe be like without dark matter? - Big Think